<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lack of Openness on New Devices Concerning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyerling.ca/2010/02/lack-of-openness-on-new-devices-concerning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyerling.ca/2010/02/lack-of-openness-on-new-devices-concerning/</link>
	<description>Vitali&#039;s Law School Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serguei</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyerling.ca/2010/02/lack-of-openness-on-new-devices-concerning/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Serguei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyerling.ca/?p=457#comment-153</guid>
		<description>You know me, I&#039;m a big picture guy. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know me, I&#8217;m a big picture guy. <img src='http://www.lawyerling.ca/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitali Berditchevski</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyerling.ca/2010/02/lack-of-openness-on-new-devices-concerning/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitali Berditchevski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyerling.ca/?p=457#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Interesting of you to take my skeleton argument and push it 50 kilometers south of where I was heading with it. Nevertheless, I do think you&#039;re right. Arguments for liberalization can apply to new technology, the global economy and everything in between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting of you to take my skeleton argument and push it 50 kilometers south of where I was heading with it. Nevertheless, I do think you&#8217;re right. Arguments for liberalization can apply to new technology, the global economy and everything in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serguei</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyerling.ca/2010/02/lack-of-openness-on-new-devices-concerning/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Serguei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyerling.ca/?p=457#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I think you just made an argument for globalization. At least, Thomas Friedman used the same logic in &quot;The World is Flat&quot;. I find it hard to disagree with either one of you, but plenty of people do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you just made an argument for globalization. At least, Thomas Friedman used the same logic in &#8220;The World is Flat&#8221;. I find it hard to disagree with either one of you, but plenty of people do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
