<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nude Brews: Man Arrested for Nudity in His Own Kitchen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyerling.ca/2009/10/naked-justice-arrested-for-nudity-in-his-own-kitchen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyerling.ca/2009/10/naked-justice-arrested-for-nudity-in-his-own-kitchen/</link>
	<description>Vitali&#039;s Law School Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serguei</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyerling.ca/2009/10/naked-justice-arrested-for-nudity-in-his-own-kitchen/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Serguei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyerling.ca/?p=429#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Last week, I was coming out of my bathroom, wearing only underwear, only to see a man standing outside my bedroom window, looking in - he was there to fix my balcony.  Since I live on the eighth floor, this is not a reasonably expected occurrence and I probably would have been acquited in court (besides, I quickly ducked behind the bed and waited out the storm), but the naked brew case resonates with me like never before. I cannot understand the judge who didn&#039;t dismiss the case right away: does he not have an expectation of privacy in his own house? Does this mean that every peeping Tom out there is justified in his/her actions owing to the fact that their victims didn&#039;t close their blinds? Ludicrous, ridiculous, outrageous. Thank goodness the dude outside my window didn&#039;t think of this, wouldn&#039;t want to be liable for showering naked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I was coming out of my bathroom, wearing only underwear, only to see a man standing outside my bedroom window, looking in &#8211; he was there to fix my balcony.  Since I live on the eighth floor, this is not a reasonably expected occurrence and I probably would have been acquited in court (besides, I quickly ducked behind the bed and waited out the storm), but the naked brew case resonates with me like never before. I cannot understand the judge who didn&#8217;t dismiss the case right away: does he not have an expectation of privacy in his own house? Does this mean that every peeping Tom out there is justified in his/her actions owing to the fact that their victims didn&#8217;t close their blinds? Ludicrous, ridiculous, outrageous. Thank goodness the dude outside my window didn&#8217;t think of this, wouldn&#8217;t want to be liable for showering naked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
